diff --git a/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/commericalDEMsnapshot.png b/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/commericalDEMsnapshot.png index 749b4d4c..3dd8e08f 100644 Binary files a/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/commericalDEMsnapshot.png and b/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/commericalDEMsnapshot.png differ diff --git a/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/performance1.png b/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/performance1.png index f09a031d..ce9828ff 100644 Binary files a/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/performance1.png and b/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/performance1.png differ diff --git a/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/phasicFlow_snapshot.png b/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/phasicFlow_snapshot.png index 032800c1..33b2999d 100644 Binary files a/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/phasicFlow_snapshot.png and b/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/images/phasicFlow_snapshot.png differ diff --git a/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/readme.md b/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/readme.md index 12c36fab..087da28a 100644 --- a/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/readme.md +++ b/benchmarks/rotatingDrum/readme.md @@ -7,14 +7,14 @@ This benchmark compares the performance of phasicFlow with a well-stablished com ## Simulation Setup
- +

Figure 1. Commercial DEM simulation snapshot

- +

Figure 2. phasicFlow simulation snapshot

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ The execution time scales linearly with particle count. phasicFlow demonstrates - 30% performance improvement when using the NVIDIA RTX A4000 compared to the RTX 4050Ti
- +

Figure 3. Calculation time comparison between phasicFlow and the well-established commercial DEM software.