image resize

This commit is contained in:
Hamidreza 2025-05-02 20:25:20 +03:30
parent 32fd6cb12e
commit 97f46379c7
4 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 549 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 124 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 129 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 55 KiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 335 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 180 KiB

View File

@ -7,14 +7,14 @@ This benchmark compares the performance of phasicFlow with a well-stablished com
## Simulation Setup
<div align="center">
<img src="./images/commericalDEMsnapshot.png" style="width: 400px;" />
<img src="./images/commericalDEMsnapshot.png"/>
<div align="center">
<p>Figure 1. Commercial DEM simulation snapshot</p>
</div>
</div>
<div align="center">
<img src="./images/phasicFlow_snapshot.png" style="width: 400px;" />
<img src="./images/phasicFlow_snapshot.png"/>
<div align="center">
<p>Figure 2. phasicFlow simulation snapshot</p>
</div>
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ The execution time scales linearly with particle count. phasicFlow demonstrates
- 30% performance improvement when using the NVIDIA RTX A4000 compared to the RTX 4050Ti
<div align="center">
<img src="./images/performance1.png" style="width: 500px;" />
<img src="./images/performance1.png"/>
<p>Figure 3. Calculation time comparison between phasicFlow and the well-established commercial DEM software.</p>
</div>